So about halfway through the second season of House of the Dragon, I decided that I really wanted to just read the 'history' that the show was based on, because I was tired of only sort of understanding who all the characters were and also I wanted to know in advance what the bad things were. The show has the same problem that most prequels do, which is that it's the story of how the world arrived at the terrible situation that the main story starts in, so it's inherently tragic and we know where the story has to end up. But I've been enjoying the show, and I'm a big fan of the style of book that Fire and Blood is; I love a fake narrative historical book, which cites differing accounts and tells us what happens but can't actually confirm why they do.
The first thing to note is that the book is extremely long and dense - the story arc that the show is based on doesn't even start for two hundred and fifty pages, and then it continues for another two hundred, more or less. I did enjoy the first parts of the book, though, which is essentially the equivalent of the Norman Conquest, an event that I know sufficiently little about to not be bothered by how much (or how little) GRRM is lifting from real history. But then I finally got to the part of the story that's been adapted, and I discovered almost immediately that I vastly prefer the show to the book, and think that basically every story change that has been made for the show improves upon the narrative immensely.
This is in large part because the book's narrative has no use for women at all. And it's arguable that this is because the entire conflict is about that cultural bias: the succession battle is kicked off by one generation choosing between a female heir and a male heir, and then the next generation has to go through the same thing, only the second time around everyone fucking dies (because, as I said, it's a tragedy). Twice the rightful heir (by birth order) is denied because of her gender, and that's just how things are because men in the fake middle ages, am I right, and look sometimes I want my fiction to make me mad I guess. But what all of the women characters are lacking in the book is any MOTIVATION for why they do anything. We are told what happened but not really why, either the delay or the unreasonable action or whatever, and this isn't me wanting characters to behave rationally and being mad that people don't always do the logical thing. That's fine! That's truthful both in fiction and reality! People make bad choices or don't succeed because of the dumbest things all the time in history. I actually really like stories that acknowledge that sometimes a letter gets delayed because of the weather and it completely alters the trajectory of millions of lives, for better or for worse.
What I don't like is a story that due to its incomplete view of characters or whatever tells me that things happen with no explanation for it at all. I'm not mad it's a tragedy; I knew what I was getting myself into. I'm just mad that honestly for the first time in my experience of reading GRRM's books, it felt like the worldview of misogyny etc. was just the explanation for everything, without the redeeming quality of getting to be in the point of view of various female characters with a diverse range of interests and abilities and failings. I don't regret reading the book because I do have a much firmer grasp on what the show is doing, and I actually enjoyed the sections that aren't about the characters in the show's narrative much much more than those sections, but boy. I finished the second season of HotD after I read the book, and it continued to diverse significantly, and I can only hope it continues to do so for however many more seasons they have to tell the whole story, because we all deserve better.
Grade: C
No comments:
Post a Comment